View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: triplets
I think taking the double "l" out is better, but it's very obvious that they're anagrams. How about Aidan, Diana and Nadia, or Alice, Celia and Lacie? It seems less contrived.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

How come those ones are less obvious? Because they have moe letters?
vote up1
It's because they have different sounds despite using the same letters. For example, the "e" in Alice isn't pronounced, it's "eh" in Celia and "ee" in Lacie. This applies for Aidan, Diana and Nadia. They all use "i," but the letter makes a "yuh" sound, "I" sound and "ee" sound, respectively. In each of the OP names the "el" sound appears, and in two the syllable "bel," which makes them obviously anagrammed.
vote up1
For me it's just less noticeable. I've never even noticed that Alice and Celia have all the same letters, but with Ellba and Abell it's like punching me in the face with sameness.ETA that I don't know why it is... it just is. Maybe it has something to do with all the L's being next to each other.

This message was edited 9/27/2009, 9:53 PM

vote up1
I agree. I think Celia, Alice, and Lacie is an awesome idea. I have never noticed that about Alice and Celia!I'd also suggest Amy, May, and Mya, even though those are obvious anagrams as well.
vote up1
I have to agree on it being obvious anagrams.Dena, Edan & Neda?Aderyn, Andrey & Yarden?Ameline, Emelina & Melanie?There's a bunch of anagram names on this site found here: http://www.behindthename.com/anagram/ That's where I found those. *shrugs* Maybe that'll help?
vote up1