Message: "Names don't need to "match" their siblings."

[Opinions] Names don't need to "match" their siblings.

by abbasdaughter

8/9/2009, 6:24 PM

Names don't need to "match" their siblings. Each child is an individual and should be named accordingly.

•Re: New celeb baby--with a good combo (IMO) · Disney2009 · 8/10/2009, 8:58 PM

•Love it · Delphi_Blue · 8/9/2009, 9:20 PM

•Re: New celeb baby--with a good combo (IMO) · Pink Princess · 8/9/2009, 8:45 PM

•Oh, charming! · blaaarg · 8/9/2009, 8:04 PM

•So handsome! [m] · molly · 8/9/2009, 8:01 PM

•Yawn · Rachel Shaina · 8/9/2009, 7:08 PM

•This. · Guinevere · 8/10/2009, 4:41 PM

•Re: New celeb baby--with a good combo (IMO) · ICEyun · 8/9/2009, 6:43 PM

•thumbs up · abbasdaughter · 8/9/2009, 6:22 PM

•Re: New celeb baby--with a good combo (IMO) · bellamiasofia · 8/9/2009, 6:06 PM

•Boring.. · Andromache · 8/9/2009, 5:56 PM

•I like Isaiah nt · Sabrina Fair · 8/9/2009, 5:30 PM

•Re: New celeb baby--with a good combo (IMO) · brighton18 · 8/9/2009, 5:16 PM

•Names don't need to "match" their siblings. · abbasdaughter · 8/9/2009, 6:24 PM

•Re: Names don't need to "match" their siblings. · brighton18 · 8/9/2009, 7:55 PM

•Taylor refined? · abbasdaughter · 8/9/2009, 8:25 PM

•Re: Taylor refined? · brighton18 · 8/9/2009, 8:56 PM

•how boring and mismatched · New_Chloe · 8/9/2009, 5:00 PM

•agreed · meganet22 · 8/9/2009, 5:49 PM

•totally (nt) · BBH · 8/9/2009, 5:03 PM

•Re: New celeb baby--with a good combo (IMO) · Kelseyyy · 8/9/2009, 4:58 PM

•I do like her. · BrilliantBlue · 8/9/2009, 4:57 PM

View Message