View Message

[Opinions] D: Really bad twinset
Twin boys...NathanandNathanel.
...seriously. http://our365.com/newbornportraits/babydetail.aspx?birthid=60134623-26b1-4f3c-8f79-d73ec7134ae6&babyid=17809e6e-bbe2-4d6b-a129-dee54e2c723f
(Also, Bryant and Bryce, which isn't AS bad. But still...
...and Christopher and Christian. :( )

This message was edited 4/17/2009, 2:53 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

that's unfortunate
vote up1
OuchThat's painful to read, let alone hear.
vote up1
Why do parents do this? Do they think its cute? Cos it isn't.I know a sibset Christopher and Tristan, I think thats too close.
vote up1
Wasn't there someone on here that knew a set of twins named Emily and Emma.
vote up1
fail
vote up1
LOL! Response win!Twinset bad :(
vote up1
You have got to be kidding me!
vote up1
Wow, not even Nathaniel. When Anna was born, I asked one of the nurses what were the worst names she had encountered in the nursery. She mentioned twin girls named Vickie and Victoria. Okay ...
vote up1
WoahThat's terrible.Let's name our twins Robert and Bob, or Richard and Rick, or Elizabeth and Beth. :/
vote up1
I don't think it's that bad. I don't like it, but they don't sound that much alike. Nathan is NAY-than while Nathanel is NEH-than-el (something like that) so they don't sound that similar to me. They just look alike.
vote up1
But in my experienceEvery Nathaniel / Nathanael ends up going by Nathan. I don't see why Nathanel would be different... except that he has a twin with that name. I dunno, I guess to me this looks like having twins named Jacob and Jake... except Nathan's a name on its own.
vote up1
I agreeIt it like naming twins Thom and Thomas or Theo and Theodore. Just wierd.
vote up1
I disagreeNathan is a full name to me and all Nathaniels I know have gone by their full name.
vote up1
My brother's name is Nathaniel and he goes by Nathan, Nathaniel, and Nate, so to me it would be incredibly confusing to name two children Nathan and Nathaniel. I am just speaking from experience and it is my opinion.
vote up1
I agree, but...we're from a non-English speaking countries and people don’t automatically have a nickname for a long name (every Sebastian, Leonardo, Nathaniel, etc. I know go by their full name, but most people on this board that are from US/UK always comment on how they don’t like the nicknames. Who says you HAVE to have a nickname?) And while those boys were born in the US, their father is clearly Latino, so my guess is they’ll go by their full names since Latinos have no problem with calling their kids by both first and middle name (Juan Carlos, Fernando, Maria Guadalupe, etc.), so Nathaniel is hardly going to be too long for them.
vote up1
I don't think it is necessarily that names have to have a nickname, but in the US it is almost inevitable that someone will call a person by a nickname. If a parent doesn't like that nickname then they may just stay away from the name altogether. After all, you can control the name but you can't control what other people nickname them.
vote up1
Well, they'll probably be in the same class and everything so I seriously doubt people would call them Nathan and Nathan!Probably Nate and Nathan, though.And when they go separate ways later I doubt it would matter.
vote up1
Oh, that is really terribleHowever, it could be worse. It could be Jayden and Jayde...nay?
vote up1