New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Hazel & Azalea? (twin girls)
in reply to a message by raindancing
I didn't see that in the name at first but I have to disagree with that because it think it sort of bonds them as twins without it being overly.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
But they will already bonded by being twins sharing the same birthdate ( unless they are lucky enough to be born either side of midnight)and their names both being plant names too many things similar and it becomes overkill
A childs smile is worth more to me than Gold
A childs smile is worth more to me than Gold
This message was edited 10/23/2005, 11:50 AM
1
I don't see it that way. I don't think it's too drastic. I never even saw it at first until you mentioned it.
1
I understand what your saying but I know several pairs of twins both identical and non idential and the majority of them hate it when people dont treat them as individuals, Cutesy twinsey names are one of their pet hates
But each to his or her own
A childs smile is worth more to me than Gold
But each to his or her own
A childs smile is worth more to me than Gold
This message was edited 10/24/2005, 4:02 AM
1
I agree with you. I don't like it when they are cutesy twinsey names. However in this case I didn't see that.
1
I agree in this case they arent cutsey names like say Milly and Tilly but Hazel and Azalea are themey and very similar especially when written down
You dont see it as a problem thats fine you are entitled to your opinion as am I, and to me at least they are too similar for siblings let alone twins
I think we have about run this discussion into the ground :)
A childs smile is worth more to me than Gold
You dont see it as a problem thats fine you are entitled to your opinion as am I, and to me at least they are too similar for siblings let alone twins
I think we have about run this discussion into the ground :)
A childs smile is worth more to me than Gold
1