Message: "Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted"

[Facts] Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted

by Chrisell

7/29/2005, 7:23 PM

in reply to a message by Serafina Starstrider

It's not so much that their database is small, as that they invent and change meanings whenever they choose. They don't care if it's accurate as long as it's "cute".

♦ Chrisell ♦

All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Messages

azriel and zariel · Brittany Smith · 7/28/2005, 8:02 PM

•Re: azriel and zariel · Miss Claire · 7/29/2005, 8:00 AM

•Re: azriel and zariel · Chrisell · 7/28/2005, 8:12 PM

•Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt · Miranda · 7/28/2005, 11:58 PM

•Re: Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt · Cleveland Kent Evans · 7/29/2005, 10:38 AM

•No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Miranda · 7/29/2005, 2:52 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Serafina Starstrider · 7/29/2005, 7:20 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Chrisell · 7/29/2005, 7:23 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Mike C · 8/2/2005, 11:42 AM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Cleveland Kent Evans · 8/6/2005, 8:30 AM

View Message

Messages