[Opinions] But they're MODERN English names
in reply to a message by Vesta
And, moreover, they're rather recent names. Prue could've probably originated in the 19th century, but Reena and Raelyn most definitely came into usage only in the 20th century. (English-speakers borrowed Renée from the French in the 20th century, btw.) Raelyn especially has absolutely no possible Old English etymology.Here is a BtN search I did on "Old English": http://snipurl.com/fpns. Also see these pages: http://snipurl.com/76uc (female names only), http://snipurl.com/bkk4 (given names for both sexes, from the years 1450-1650), and (http://snipurl.com/fpny) (Kate Monk's list).Keep in mind that no sane Old English parent would have dreamed of naming their kids transferred surnames, so names like Kimberly, Ridley, Ashley, etc. are out. Also, though Clover and Daisy come from Old English, they wouldn't have been used as given names either; ditto for Éowyn, which comes from Old English, but which I've never seen in any period record.

Miranda
"Come... you must eat my child." — From an unknown badfic.Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Mab, Merlin, Morgan....  ·  Vesta  ·  6/19/2005, 7:17 PM
Raelyn = white trash. Period. Reena? trendy. Prue? NN only. nt  ·  Siri  ·  6/20/2005, 9:16 PM
Re: Mab, Merlin, Morgan....  ·  Chrisell  ·  6/20/2005, 3:41 AM
Re: Mab, Merlin, Morgan....  ·  Vesta  ·  6/20/2005, 8:18 AM
But they're MODERN English names  ·  Miranda  ·  6/20/2005, 1:59 PM
Re: But they're MODERN English names  ·  Vesta  ·  6/20/2005, 3:12 PM
Anglo-Saxon and Old English are the same thing. nt  ·  Miranda  ·  6/20/2005, 4:04 PM
Re: Anglo-Saxon and Old English are the same thing. nt  ·  Vesta  ·  6/20/2005, 6:48 PM
Wyatt?nt  ·  Urania  ·  6/19/2005, 8:24 PM