Hazel (feminine) | |||
Year | Rank | Percent Used | |
2023 | #18 | 0.352 | |
2022 | #27 | 0.343 | |
2021 | #28 | 0.335 | |
2020 | #31 | 0.312 | |
2019 | #33 | 0.298 | |
2018 | #42 | 0.266 | |
2017 | #43 | 0.267 | |
2016 | #52 | 0.242 | |
2015 | #63 | 0.221 | |
2014 | #105 | 0.149 | |
2013 | #157 | 0.107 | |
2012 | #173 | 0.092 | |
2011 | #211 | 0.076 | |
2010 | #264 | 0.063 | |
2009 | #293 | 0.056 | |
2008 | #344 | 0.046 | |
2007 | #357 | 0.043 | |
2006 | #466 | 0.033 | |
2005 | #514 | 0.028 | |
2004 | #682 | 0.020 | |
2003 | #680 | 0.019 | |
2002 | #767 | 0.016 | |
2001 | #750 | 0.016 | |
2000 | #893 | 0.012 | |
1999 | #914 | 0.012 | |
1998 | #941 | 0.011 | |
1997 | - | - | |
1996 | - | - | |
1995 | - | - | |
1994 | - | - | |
1993 | - | - | |
1992 | - | - | |
1991 | - | - | |
1990 | - | - | |
1989 | - | - | |
1988 | - | - | |
1987 | - | - | |
1986 | - | - | |
1985 | - | - | |
1984 | - | - | |
1983 | - | - | |
1982 | - | - | |
1981 | - | - | |
1980 | - | - | |
1979 | - | - | |
1978 | - | - | |
1977 | - | - | |
1976 | - | - | |
1975 | #943 | 0.009 | |
1974 | #924 | 0.009 | |
1973 | #890 | 0.009 | |
1972 | #798 | 0.010 | |
1971 | #771 | 0.011 | |
1970 | #676 | 0.013 | |
1969 | #684 | 0.012 | |
1968 | #618 | 0.014 | |
1967 | #594 | 0.015 | |
1966 | #541 | 0.017 | |
1965 | #515 | 0.019 | |
1964 | #512 | 0.019 | |
1963 | #470 | 0.021 | |
1962 | #460 | 0.022 | |
1961 | #433 | 0.025 | |
1960 | #397 | 0.028 | |
1959 | #392 | 0.028 | |
1958 | #360 | 0.032 | |
1957 | #333 | 0.036 | |
1956 | #315 | 0.037 | |
1955 | #286 | 0.045 | |
1954 | #256 | 0.052 | |
1953 | #251 | 0.054 | |
1952 | #243 | 0.056 | |
1951 | #226 | 0.062 | |
1950 | #219 | 0.067 | |
1949 | #205 | 0.075 | |
1948 | #199 | 0.077 | |
1947 | #183 | 0.086 | |
1946 | #175 | 0.094 | |
1945 | #164 | 0.107 | |
1944 | #147 | 0.121 | |
1943 | #144 | 0.129 | |
1942 | #139 | 0.137 | |
1941 | #131 | 0.159 | |
1940 | #123 | 0.175 | |
1939 | #118 | 0.185 | |
1938 | #111 | 0.205 | |
1937 | #106 | 0.213 | |
1936 | #96 | 0.233 | |
1935 | #92 | 0.248 | |
1934 | #87 | 0.260 | |
1933 | #82 | 0.289 | |
1932 | #75 | 0.302 | |
1931 | #74 | 0.318 | |
1930 | #71 | 0.333 | |
1929 | #64 | 0.360 | |
1928 | #59 | 0.389 | |
1927 | #53 | 0.412 | |
1926 | #48 | 0.431 | |
1925 | #45 | 0.458 | |
1924 | #42 | 0.489 | |
1923 | #40 | 0.499 | |
1922 | #37 | 0.542 | |
1921 | #34 | 0.574 | |
1920 | #34 | 0.587 | |
1919 | #32 | 0.633 | |
1918 | #33 | 0.633 | |
1917 | #31 | 0.648 | |
1916 | #31 | 0.664 | |
1915 | #26 | 0.693 | |
1914 | #29 | 0.668 | |
1913 | #27 | 0.701 | |
1912 | #25 | 0.715 | |
1911 | #25 | 0.745 | |
1910 | #24 | 0.723 | |
1909 | #24 | 0.736 | |
1908 | #24 | 0.761 | |
1907 | #23 | 0.750 | |
1906 | #23 | 0.739 | |
1905 | #25 | 0.759 | |
1904 | #23 | 0.787 | |
1903 | #26 | 0.769 | |
1902 | #25 | 0.798 | |
1901 | #23 | 0.825 | |
1900 | #29 | 0.763 | |
1899 | #26 | 0.821 | |
1898 | #19 | 0.890 | |
1897 | #18 | 0.942 | |
1896 | #22 | 0.883 | |
1895 | #22 | 0.911 | |
1894 | #23 | 0.891 | |
1893 | #22 | 0.911 | |
1892 | #25 | 0.843 | |
1891 | #32 | 0.736 | |
1890 | #37 | 0.677 | |
1889 | #48 | 0.558 | |
1888 | #54 | 0.474 | |
1887 | #72 | 0.324 | |
1886 | #81 | 0.279 | |
1885 | #105 | 0.198 | |
1884 | #122 | 0.152 | |
1883 | #149 | 0.102 | |
1882 | #190 | 0.063 | |
1881 | #216 | 0.051 | |
1880 | #352 | 0.022 | |