My husband’s name is Branson and he’s indifferent about it. I personally love it. My in-laws didn’t even think about the city in Missouri when they named him. Obviously I think it can be used as a first name, and is much more pleasing than the ever popular ‘Brandon’.
This does not seem like a first name to me, probably because Tom Branson is the chauffeur-turned-estate-manager on "Downton Abbey," whom the Dowager Countess always wants to keep calling by his last name even though he married one of her granddaughters.
― Anonymous User 9/5/2014
1
Ughh. I'm so tired of people turning every other surname into a first name. What about this name makes it attractive as a first name? It sounds quite uneducated and is probably very popular in the unwed teenage parent community. It's only a matter of time before it crosses the gender line and spawns "feminine" variants like Bransyn, bransin, bransynn, or bransen.
― Anonymous User 6/12/2013
0
My typical rule for surname-turned-forenames is that they best be left until the end of the first name and middl ename... in other words: they should remain last names. I admit that there are a select few that I can tolerate with a quiet disgust-- but "Branson" does not happen to be one. I find it unbelievably juvenile and unprofessional, uneducated, borderline "kre8tiv," and entirely unattractive.
For some reason, this name makes me think of a slightly chubby, obnoxious, and annoying 12-year-old boy. Besides, I don't really like names that start with ''Bran'', with the exception of Brandon.