New Post
Search
HelpThat was what I was wondering, too. (nt)
in reply to a message by Rachel
nt
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Hmm .. I feel like an idiot :] Hahaha
Sorry about that one guys!! Next round I guess we will use 1998 as it's too late now, and most of the names are probably on the list anyways. Wow, I feel stupid :P I need more sleep.
Sorry about that one guys!! Next round I guess we will use 1998 as it's too late now, and most of the names are probably on the list anyways. Wow, I feel stupid :P I need more sleep.
1
Oh, plus [well where I live at least] kindergarteners are 5-turning-6 or already 6 during the year, so if we did it as THIS year (2006-2007) the kids are 5 or 6 years old, which is what I went off of :]
1