View Message

Euphonic naming practice is not beholden to spelling rules or historical meanings, as we onomatologists are wont to be. Otherwise, variants (and respellings) would hold no meaning at all, due to their "incorrect" spelling.

---

If JOHN can share the meaning of YEHOWCHANAN,
HARRY can be treated as a modern variant of "hairy,"
as much as it is a traditional variant to HEIMRICH. (Heimrich and "hairy" both have linguistic pedigrees. Harry, ultimately, is a colloquialism or corruption and can go anywhere it fits. It has no base morpheme.)

---

A mom could declare, "Because he was so hairy, we named him Harry!"

---

Linguistic rationale clearly stated. It is (in that specific case) a homophonic, hence variant, name for "hairy."

---

Your etymological objections do not stand in a euphonic naming society. Its traditional etymology remains intact for those who don't impose such a meaning.

---

Modern languages are just as valid of resources for names as classical ones are.

---

"Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are sons born in one's youth." Ps. 127:4

---

JoHannah Jubilee, BenJudah Gabriel, Aaron Josiah, Jordan Uriah,
Maranatha Nissiah, (Anastasia Nike, 1992-1992), Jeshua David,
Shiloh Joshana, Elijah Daniel, Hezekiah Nathaniel, Zephaniah Joseph

This message was edited 10/25/2014, 4:20 AM