New Post
Search
HelpQuite true (m)
in reply to a message by xPrincess27x
And not fit for a merman either.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
but...
Christian used to be a popular girls name in the Middle Ages. Nobody is complaining when people use Christian for a boy but everybody always complains when Madison or Mackenzie are used for girls. I dislike both Madison and Mackenzie and prefer them for boys. I just think it's annoying how people always say "it's a boys name" whenever people ask opinions on names such as Meredith and Madison. They originally were boys names, sure, but now they are unisex like it or not. Christian is not even listed as "masculine and feminine" anymore in the database.
Christian used to be a popular girls name in the Middle Ages. Nobody is complaining when people use Christian for a boy but everybody always complains when Madison or Mackenzie are used for girls. I dislike both Madison and Mackenzie and prefer them for boys. I just think it's annoying how people always say "it's a boys name" whenever people ask opinions on names such as Meredith and Madison. They originally were boys names, sure, but now they are unisex like it or not. Christian is not even listed as "masculine and feminine" anymore in the database.
This message was edited 9/17/2008, 10:19 AM
1
It would bother me to see those names on girls too. But at least you have the legitimate argument of a gender-neutral meaning. There's nothing gender-neutral about a name meaning son of someone though. So those names in particular bother me to see on girls.
1