View Message

Colin & Lynn??
Friends of mine already have a little son named Colin, now they thinking aboout naming their soon coming daughter Lynn, but i think that thats a rather bad idea 'cause well CoLIN already has the name Lynn in it.
What do you think?
Do you have better suggestion for them?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Dont do it. Thats ridiculous.
vote up1
I have too many to list!
vote up1
It is similar, but at least written it looks different enough. Plus in my accent Colin is not very "LIN", but more schwa vowel *insert upsidedown e* (computers and I rarely get along).So I think Colin and Lynn are fine as siblings. In how they feel to me I think they are actually really nice together.Though there's many names out there with Lyn/n or "LIN" in them if it's an issue. eg: Linley, Madelyn, Gwendolyn, Jocelyn, Linsay / Linsey / Lindsay, Katelyn, Aislinn, Belinda...
http://www.behindthename.com/php/search.php?nmd=n&terms=*lin*+*lyn*&submit=Go
vote up1
I think its WAY to close. And Lynn is very dated/more of a mn in my opinion.
http://www.babynames.com/namelist/9647279
vote up1
I like both names, but I agree that Lynn is too close to Colin. It's unfortunate because I would really like to see Lynn used as a FN for a child nowadays.
vote up1
Yes, the names are too similar, one being, in its totality, nothing more than the second syllable of the first one.That aside, I really hate the name Lynn or Lynne anyway. Very plain and not feminine.
vote up1
I don't think Lynn would be good with Colin. I agree, I love to see Lynn being used as a first name, I don't think it would fit with Colin. It's weird, but personally I don't like names like this together, like the "Emma" "Emily" thing, because when you hear it, you hear emma and emma-lee, which I, for some reason, think one child only is half of the other, but only name-wise, obviously. That may sound weird. I tend to think like that though ;-) So not everyone may think that, and if they want it, they should go for it. Also, both the fact it's a girl and a boy, and the spelling of "Lynn" making it less noticable (on paper, anyway), it may not be a big deal. And like I said, if they want it, sure why not. I just personally wouldn't do that.But like someone else said, if they don't use it, they can use names that could possibly have Lynn as a nickname like Jacqueline, Caitlin any other varients of those two, Jocelyn, Evelyn, Marilyn, etc.

This message was edited 8/28/2008, 1:34 PM

vote up1
When I read the two names, my first reaction was, "That's a little repetitive." I agree with you. How about:Colin &Nora
Bridget
Emily - if the popularity doesn't bother your friends. I know of twins named Colin and Emily and I think the combination works
Iona
Tegan
Miriam
Mary
Daphne
Hannah - it is beginning its popularity decent after a long time at the top, which personally bothers me a bit, but it is still a good name with Colin
Julia / Julie - I slightly prefer Julie but some may think it's dated (I disagree)
Sophia / Sophie - slightly prefer Sophie.
vote up1
I don't think it's a problem. If Colin was pronounced cah-LIN rather than CAH-lin, it would be a different story, but as it isn't it's not very noticeable.
vote up1
I think Colin and Lynn are okay for siblings even though they are a bit repetitive. The repeating "lyn" sound is not that bad. It's not like Holly and Molly or something. It's nice to see Lynn used as a first name. She could use Linnea or Linnéa (only like it pronounced with three syllables).
vote up1
Pooh! Finally, finally, finally! Someone is considering Lynn as a fn. They would have to have another child whose name makes it awkward. Why are they doing this to me?Normally I'd suggest something like Linnet ("LINN-ett") or Jocelyn. But I'm too disappointed at not being able to vote for lovely Lynn that I'm going to go sulk in a corner. Woe is me.
vote up1
Your right, the combo seems too LIN-sound heavy. How about:Lydia
Yolande
Elena
Lana:0)

This message was edited 8/28/2008, 11:09 AM

vote up1