New Post
Search
HelpJust a theory...
in reply to a message by IrishGirl
I don't think any of us would really know very many Patsy/Putsy-esque twins, nor would we know any twins named Tyler and Taylor or Christina and Christopher. I have a theory that we wouldn't care about names as much as we do if we lived in an area with no sophisticated, interesting names and if every baby we knew was called Samantha or Nicholas. I like both of those names very much, but they're boring. We need "name stimulation" to get us interested and thinking about names.
If this theory is correct, the majority of us would come from communities that have a few interesting [note: not neccessarily good, but *interesting*] names to spark our interest. Therefore, we probably wouldn't know too many themey twins.
Does this make any sense? It's very logical to me, but I can't phrase it correctly when written out. :/
If this theory is correct, the majority of us would come from communities that have a few interesting [note: not neccessarily good, but *interesting*] names to spark our interest. Therefore, we probably wouldn't know too many themey twins.
Does this make any sense? It's very logical to me, but I can't phrase it correctly when written out. :/
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1