View Message

I don't like matchy-rhymey sibsets in reality. It's cute for a story, but in real life I think children should be considered individuals. Not collections of a set. Then again, there are some exceptions that I like to my own rule (floral middle names in a set, for instance) so maybe I'm just full of it :P

---

I think Liberty and Charity feel 80s-90s dated. I like Serenity. Not a big fan of Verity.

---

If I had to adjust the names (assuming you want them to be words) I'd choose:

---

1. Serenity
2. Felicity
3. Levity
4. Divinity

---

I tried to pick names with feelings I'd want them to experience, rather than exemplify. I only like Serenity and Felicity, though!

---

“Fairy tales are more than true; not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.”
― Neil Gaiman