View Message

You didn't say you disliked Connor because it was recent, though, you said you disliked it because it was a last name. Connor and James and Michael are all similar in that they are first names that have last names derived from them. That appeared to be your criticism.

---

If your view really was all along that any name that has not been common for millennia is unimaginative and pretentious - well, that's a really odd view.

---

http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/87410