View Message

Interesting topic :)

---

What do you think of the bottom 5 names in 2003. Instead of the top 5 names, these are the bottom 5 names. (They're the last 5 names at the bottom of the list). What do you think of them?,

---

Girls
999. Katy - I don't care for this as a formal name or for the variation in spelling, but I also don't care for Katie because it's SO common and somewhat cliched (sp?) imo
998. Angeline - not bad
997. Rory - much better for a boy imo
996. Laisha - what's this??
995. Kaylen - I actually loved this name (Kaylyn) about 10 or so years ago, but I was very young then

---

Boys
999. Zayne - I really like Zane
998. Yosef - ok
997. Trevion - no
996. Kyree - no
995. Kasey - Casey is ok

---

And what do you think of the bottom 5 names of the years 1900-1909?

---

Girls
999. Zoila - ugh
998. Virgil - for a girl?
997. Tressa - not horrible
996. Rossie - not a horrible nn
995. Norene - alternative spellings even back then, eh?

---

Boys
999. Stephan - ok
998. Stefan - ok, better spelling
997. Solon - not bad
996. Rodolfo - ok
995. Raul - ok

---