View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Jack as a nickname for John
in reply to a message by Xena
I know at least one of these people isn't a junior (although oddly, his younger brother is). Well, how many people slap Chuck on their kid's birth certificate as opposed to Charles? They're both one syllable C names. But one's more formal than the other. Americans like their sons to have formal full names more so than other Anglo countries. My university has a student directory, so looking at it there's 26 Johns who have put in that they prefer Jack. One is an IV, but if the rest are a Jr./III/IV, they don't have it listed. There's also two Jonathans who prefer Jack, which shows how solid the nickname association is in Massachusetts.

This message was edited 9/7/2019, 3:09 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I mean I get differentiating different people and having informal versions of names. But John and Jack are just two separate names in my head.. not like say Samuel and Sam or Michael and Mike.
vote up1
Yes - yet Rory is frequently independent from Aurora - but it is not always.It is far easier on others to introduce one's self with a name (form) of preference rather than one's legal name.If I were Charles and preferred Chuck--and introduced myself accordingly, some would still have the audacity to call me Charlie.

This message was edited 9/8/2019, 9:35 AM

vote up1