[Opinions] Re: Mabel
in reply to a message by queenv
It's cute, I don't dislike it. I wouldn't use it myself but it has the kind of sound that might put it in the middle of the charts. I don't think it would become as popular as Hazel.
This message was edited 11/14/2015, 8:19 AM
Replies
Is everyone misreading my post? I said "similar in style to Hazel" and "it will be increasing in popularity". Not "It is exactly the same as Hazel and will be identically as popular." It's "similar". As in, old lady name (peaked in the 1910's) with a long A (people love long As!) and an -el ending.
Now, if it had a cool Z in it and there was a popular author writing a popular book that was followed by a popular movie featuring a Mabel...
Now, if it had a cool Z in it and there was a popular author writing a popular book that was followed by a popular movie featuring a Mabel...
This message was edited 11/14/2015, 9:46 AM
I guess I figured your reply to RoxStar also incorporated info from my post since I brought up Hazel and Rox did not.
What book is that?
The Fault in Our Stars had a Hazel (Hazel Grace). There were ~1400 Hazels born before the book came out (2011) and double that by the time the movie was released (2014).
It was still somewhat popular, but I think TFiOs gave it a boost. Just like -bella names were popular, Isabella probably would have always been popular, but Twilight probably helped push it a few more spots/moved it faster.
It was still somewhat popular, but I think TFiOs gave it a boost. Just like -bella names were popular, Isabella probably would have always been popular, but Twilight probably helped push it a few more spots/moved it faster.
I actually read that book, and I forgot all about Hazel. Erm. :/
Now that it's been brought up, I think that book is seriously overrated, but that's another post for another day.
Now that it's been brought up, I think that book is seriously overrated, but that's another post for another day.
This message was edited 11/14/2015, 11:01 AM