View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Aaarrrghh!
Looks like a great site. But it doesn't have the name Regan on there, unfortunately.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

derpmissed the point entirely good jobtry reading the actual article

This message was edited 6/24/2011, 1:38 PM

vote up1
Um, I did read it. I get what the author is saying, but considering that's a baby name site and the author is telling us that baby books make up meanings for baby names, I assumed that the names on that site had meanings that were cited from sources. I then looked up their name list and didn't find one for the name I was interested in. Or should I have assumed the author of the site would publish meanings without sources right after an article on the index bashing that practice?Try not being so rude if you choose to reply.
vote up1
Norah Namenerd, who is posting in this thread, is the author of that post. In the post in which she provided that link, she also says "BtN is one of the only sites i trust!"
Look up Regan on BTN. See meaning. Understand the other sites are wrong, because THAT IS WHAT HER ARTICLE IS TELLING YOU, WITH ACCURACY. End.
And I will reply as I see fit, guest.

This message was edited 6/24/2011, 11:12 PM

vote up1
Climb down off your perch, Oh Holy One. You don't intimidate me. Everyone else on this thread has managed to be civil, including the poster to whom you're referring. Give it a shot and maybe I'll give what you say the tiniest amount of credence. Until then, don't tell me what is "the end" and quit the inane "the sites are wrong because she's telling you they are" nonsense. I'm a free-thinking adult and don't need others telling me what is and isn't right.Now, THE END! Geez, take a chill pill.
vote up1
It's not really a baby name site, it's a site about names.
vote up1