View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Fuschia is horrible ...
it is wrong! And this is why (from wiki):While the original pronunciation from the word's German origin is "fook-sya" /ˈfʊksja/, most English speakers tend to say "fyew'sha" /ˈfjuːʃə/. As a result, the word is often subjected to misspellings such as "fushcia" or "fuschia". In English, the other acceptable pronunciation is "fyewk'see-ah", which is somewhat truer to the word's origin.I dunno if you care for it, but I really wouldn't use a wrongly spelled word as a name. By the way, Fuchs means "fox" in German.But I do like Fuchsia :) I think it works better as a middle name though, so Nicole Fuchsia. Then it's really beautiful. As a first name it's too much of a word to me, since it doesn't seem to be as well established as Scarlet or Violet. Also it seems to be an easy-to-make-fun-of-name, as others mentioned already.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I assumed that the spelling was variable because of my dictionary, which lists both spellings, but apparently I was wrong. Whoops. I think -sch looks betters than -chs, though, still, because fuchsia begins with fuc and then a h which, with sloppy handwriting, could easily look like a k, so I always preferred the fuschia spelling. But you are right in that mispelled named are horrible. It's a dilemma.
vote up1
fuschia is always a misspelling
vote up1
I understand Fuchsia hasn't been established as a "name" (I don't believe Scarlet and Violet are established names they are a color and flower they were before it was used and is still after) but maybe if people starting using it it would. I'm sure the first Scarlets and Violets were "odd".

This message was edited 2/7/2008, 10:30 AM

vote up1