Message: "Re: EJ's Generational Congrats (Round 1)"

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: EJ's Generational Congrats (Round 1)

by KearaJane (guest)

7/5/2009, 6:38 PM

in reply to a message by Anthroponomastics

DH: Graham William I (1889)
DW: Elena Mary-Anna (1885)
+DS: Graham William II (1900)+

Replies

- KearaJane (guest) +3

7/5/2009, 6:42 PM

I made them young as it was more common then!

- Anthroponomastics +2

7/5/2009, 6:50 PM

Okay, but did the father have to be 11 years of age? I don't think it was possible back then for most young men to father children that young...I understand the mother being 15 but don't you think that girls didn't normally have children until they were at least 16, and then with older men or men the same age? 11 is too young.

- KearaJane (guest) +1

7/5/2009, 7:12 PM

WHOOPS!

WHOPPS! Did I really make him be 11? Geez, I meant to make him 19! I'm sorry!!!!! She can be 16 also

- Anthroponomastics

7/6/2009, 6:16 AM

Thanks...that would have been freaky.
Yeah, I made my girl 16 as well, due to the popularity of Parthenia in certain years.

View Message

Replies