Mittag...does it really mean "lunch?"
Replies
I am not sure it means a meal .. it translates literally to simply "Midday." Maybe the word is used that way by German speakers, but it's not precisely the meaning.. so it's not so strange.
- chazda
- chazda
This message was edited 10/12/2004, 6:15 PM
I agree . . .
Mittag doesn't mean 'lunch', it means 'midday' - you can see it clearly in the word, 'mit' = mid, 'tag' = day. 'Lunch' is an association, not a meaning.
Mittag doesn't mean 'lunch', it means 'midday' - you can see it clearly in the word, 'mit' = mid, 'tag' = day. 'Lunch' is an association, not a meaning.
You are right, "Mittag" means "midday" to begin with. But it is also used as a term for lunch. For instance you would say "Mittag essen" (to have lunch; "Mittagessen" written in one word is official for "lunch"), but this is from "zu Mittag essen".
If you take a look at Grimms Wörterbuch, you will find:
"Mittag machen" (literally: "to make midday"; "to have lunch")
"daher 'mittag' auch geradezu für das mittagessen selbst" ("Hence 'mittag' also for lunch itself"). Same in a modern dictionary.
By the way, in the south of Germany and in Switzerland "Mittag" stretches well into the afternoon.
Andy ;—)
If you take a look at Grimms Wörterbuch, you will find:
"Mittag machen" (literally: "to make midday"; "to have lunch")
"daher 'mittag' auch geradezu für das mittagessen selbst" ("Hence 'mittag' also for lunch itself"). Same in a modern dictionary.
By the way, in the south of Germany and in Switzerland "Mittag" stretches well into the afternoon.
Andy ;—)
Yup, that's pretty much what I meant :-)
True!
a
a