New Post
Search
Help
ArchivesAttn. Mike - Ratings
Mike:
I really like your rating system, except for one thing. You have "Nerdy" and "Unintellectual" as a rating. Um - Nerdy is one thing, intellectual is another. Lester is nerdy - but Bejamin is Intellectual.
Wondering if anyone else is bothered by this.
I really like your rating system, except for one thing. You have "Nerdy" and "Unintellectual" as a rating. Um - Nerdy is one thing, intellectual is another. Lester is nerdy - but Bejamin is Intellectual.
Wondering if anyone else is bothered by this.
1
Replies
What I find confusing...
Are "urban v. natural" and "upperclass v. common". Because common is paired with upperclass, are we to assume common is meant in the sense of lowly commoners, as opposed to popular/widely used? And whatever does urban mean in regards to a name? Or natural, for that matter?
Are "urban v. natural" and "upperclass v. common". Because common is paired with upperclass, are we to assume common is meant in the sense of lowly commoners, as opposed to popular/widely used? And whatever does urban mean in regards to a name? Or natural, for that matter?
1
I agree.
And to add, I'm also baffled by the Strange --> Boring rating.
===
And to add, I'm also baffled by the Strange --> Boring rating.
===
1
one explanation ... (replying to Siri also)
Each pair of characteristics needs to have about equally positive or negative connotations, or else people are likely to just choose the more positive for names they like, and vice versa for names they dislike; and avoiding certain stereotypes seems desirable since not all names would fit (for example) on one end of the jock/brain continuum.
So "Nerdy vs. Unintellectual" is instead of things like:
bookworm vs. flirt (not really opposites; overstatement)
brainy vs. brawny (suggests gender stereotype)
analytical vs. pragmatic (ten-dollar words)
observant vs. participator (not a useful or interesting distinction)
Can you think of a better way to express this pair of "opposites"? I couldn't, although I agree that "nerdy v unintellectual" isn't ideal.
Also, it seems that having some pairs of "opposites" be negative (like strange / boring and nerdy / unintellectual) gives people an opportunity to indicate that they have some of these negative reactions to names. I mean, if it were "exotic vs. usual" and the name is Nevaeh, you can't really say it's usual, but neither would you wish to claim it is exotic ... A lot of the time when a name is unfamiliar it really does seem "strange," and much of the time a well-used name is called "boring" by a lot of people. I agree the "strange / boring" split seems odd, but I'm not sure I can think of any pair of words that doesn't have other drawbacks for the purpose of the rating survey.
- mirfak
Each pair of characteristics needs to have about equally positive or negative connotations, or else people are likely to just choose the more positive for names they like, and vice versa for names they dislike; and avoiding certain stereotypes seems desirable since not all names would fit (for example) on one end of the jock/brain continuum.
So "Nerdy vs. Unintellectual" is instead of things like:
bookworm vs. flirt (not really opposites; overstatement)
brainy vs. brawny (suggests gender stereotype)
analytical vs. pragmatic (ten-dollar words)
observant vs. participator (not a useful or interesting distinction)
Can you think of a better way to express this pair of "opposites"? I couldn't, although I agree that "nerdy v unintellectual" isn't ideal.
Also, it seems that having some pairs of "opposites" be negative (like strange / boring and nerdy / unintellectual) gives people an opportunity to indicate that they have some of these negative reactions to names. I mean, if it were "exotic vs. usual" and the name is Nevaeh, you can't really say it's usual, but neither would you wish to claim it is exotic ... A lot of the time when a name is unfamiliar it really does seem "strange," and much of the time a well-used name is called "boring" by a lot of people. I agree the "strange / boring" split seems odd, but I'm not sure I can think of any pair of words that doesn't have other drawbacks for the purpose of the rating survey.
- mirfak
This message was edited 6/2/2006, 9:13 AM
1
Personally
I think opposites work better - ie Intelligent vs. Unintellectual - by FAR.
In fact, it's impossible for me to rate names sometimes because I can't choose either of those. Strange/Boring is fine -as long as their is a scale, not either or.
I think opposites work better - ie Intelligent vs. Unintellectual - by FAR.
In fact, it's impossible for me to rate names sometimes because I can't choose either of those. Strange/Boring is fine -as long as their is a scale, not either or.
1
Second that.
1