New Post
Search
Help
ArchivesPaul and Saul
in reply to a message by Andy ;—)
It appears that Saul was his "circumcision name" and that Paul may or may have not been given to him as a "liaison name" for use with non-Jews.
According to a Catholic encyclopedia site (for what its worth)(http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11567b.htm) he was given both names Saul and Paul at birth, but opted for Paul (Pavlos) because the Greek adaptation of Saul (Savlos) indeed had ludicrous connotations (as I pointed out above).
Poor joke alert: It is possible that Paul had held on to Saul, the spread of Christianity could have failed, at least in areas where Greek was the *lingua* *franca*. In the same vein, had Ralph Lipschitz not changed his name to Ralph Lauren, maybe very few English-speakers would be prorting shirts with polo ponies on them :)
According to a Catholic encyclopedia site (for what its worth)(http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11567b.htm) he was given both names Saul and Paul at birth, but opted for Paul (Pavlos) because the Greek adaptation of Saul (Savlos) indeed had ludicrous connotations (as I pointed out above).
Poor joke alert: It is possible that Paul had held on to Saul, the spread of Christianity could have failed, at least in areas where Greek was the *lingua* *franca*. In the same vein, had Ralph Lipschitz not changed his name to Ralph Lauren, maybe very few English-speakers would be prorting shirts with polo ponies on them :)
1
Replies
If I read it carefully, the Catholic Encyclopedia does not state anything about the point of time, when Saul received his second name Paul. Of course I have no idea what Deissmann had (!) to say about this (the articles on the site are almost 100 years old). And unfortunately I can't find my source any more telling that Paul could have possibly adopted the name Paul altogether as an adult. But I don't think this really matters. The connection with "strutting" was new to me, though. Thanks!
1