New Post
Search
Help
ArchivesReplies
This belongs on the opinions board.
$
$
1
oh its under facts for a reason
1
Well, whatever the reason is, its the wrong reason, because the post does not belong here. Please re-post on Opinions.
1
This board is for the discussion of names and their meaning, history, and usage.
I don't understand what this post has to do with the meaning, history, and usage of names. I think it would better fit the Name Opinions Board, because, well, it's about OPINIONS. You're asking if people share your OPINION about how they aren't names.
Please post this on the Name Opinions Board, or explain the reason why you're putting it under facts.
I don't understand what this post has to do with the meaning, history, and usage of names. I think it would better fit the Name Opinions Board, because, well, it's about OPINIONS. You're asking if people share your OPINION about how they aren't names.
Please post this on the Name Opinions Board, or explain the reason why you're putting it under facts.
1
well something is either a name or its not a name right? so it is a FACT that they are not really names, you see? But I see I might have touched some nerves here.
1
"well something is either a name or its not a name right?"
If a word has been used as a name, then it's a name. Whether random words should be used as names is another matter . . . and it's a matter of opinion.
If you want to discuss the merits of those particular names, the Opinions board is the place to do it.
If a word has been used as a name, then it's a name. Whether random words should be used as names is another matter . . . and it's a matter of opinion.
If you want to discuss the merits of those particular names, the Opinions board is the place to do it.
1
OK, if you're going by that logic then Pilot Inspektor is a name. Funny, I can't find it on this website anywhere... or any other name sites for that matter.
1
Yes, Pilot Inspektor is a name. It's the name of the person named Pilot Inspektor. Otherwise, that person is nameless. Is that your argument, that people with strange word names are in fact nameless?
This website is one of the most comprehensive, but it is by no means complete. The fact that something doesn't appear in the database of a name site is meaningless.
Please, drop the sassy attitude. You've been told where to post your original enquiry, and if it's important to you, you should open it up for discussion on Opinions. If it's not that important (which it doesn't seem to be, given that you haven't reposted it), then forget about it. But don't keep backchatting the folks on this board. We've been here a long time and we know what the boards are for. You haven't, and you don't, so you need to accept redirection.
This website is one of the most comprehensive, but it is by no means complete. The fact that something doesn't appear in the database of a name site is meaningless.
Please, drop the sassy attitude. You've been told where to post your original enquiry, and if it's important to you, you should open it up for discussion on Opinions. If it's not that important (which it doesn't seem to be, given that you haven't reposted it), then forget about it. But don't keep backchatting the folks on this board. We've been here a long time and we know what the boards are for. You haven't, and you don't, so you need to accept redirection.
1
If you know that it has been used as a name by some person, or some person is thinking of using that as a name, you are more than welcome to discuss the origin of the name, who used it first and where, and the frequency of its usage, on this board. Of the names that have been historically recorded as having been used in the various cultures of the world (how many is that, anyone hazard a guess? a few tens of thousands or a few million?), very few appear on this board, so its not having appeared before should not stop you.
You are also welcome to discuss with what frequency people in various cultures invent new names from words. You have to realize that in some cultures, unlike in Europe and America, practically all names are actually words or combination of words, and many are used in sentences as non-names all the time. In some of these, words often those that express qualities, are taken over as new names regularly. Commemorative nonce names are seen in almost all cultures. You are welcome to discuss how often that happens as well.
In short, any discussion of how people name people (or themselves) is welcome. Whether it appears on baby name sites is not useful except when discussing its frequency or mis/interpretation. Discussion of cultural traditions and difference between names and nicknames, whether the cultural border between names or epithets are strong, etc. are also welcome.
Facts on this board are facts about human behaviour: what motivates us to name people a certain way, including the history of the very sounds we use in that fashion. (We call this entire body of knowledge `facts about names' as a shortcut.) Whether people should call people a certain way, is however, a different mode of study (`should' always needs different methods than `is') and is not interesting to many of us here. Your question about whether something is a name to these of us only means whether it has ever been used as a name somewhere by someone: you are welcome to discuss that.
Do you see the point?
You are also welcome to discuss with what frequency people in various cultures invent new names from words. You have to realize that in some cultures, unlike in Europe and America, practically all names are actually words or combination of words, and many are used in sentences as non-names all the time. In some of these, words often those that express qualities, are taken over as new names regularly. Commemorative nonce names are seen in almost all cultures. You are welcome to discuss how often that happens as well.
In short, any discussion of how people name people (or themselves) is welcome. Whether it appears on baby name sites is not useful except when discussing its frequency or mis/interpretation. Discussion of cultural traditions and difference between names and nicknames, whether the cultural border between names or epithets are strong, etc. are also welcome.
Facts on this board are facts about human behaviour: what motivates us to name people a certain way, including the history of the very sounds we use in that fashion. (We call this entire body of knowledge `facts about names' as a shortcut.) Whether people should call people a certain way, is however, a different mode of study (`should' always needs different methods than `is') and is not interesting to many of us here. Your question about whether something is a name to these of us only means whether it has ever been used as a name somewhere by someone: you are welcome to discuss that.
Do you see the point?
1