Re: names obviously...
in reply to a message by skye
This is a rather strange question, and I don't know how to answer.
One thing is clear however, if you ask me: Your question does not make sense if you don't indicate a language. Even in 106 AD there were a multitude of languages, and pronounciations always depend on language.
So what did you have in mind? Latin? Greek? Hebrew? Something other still?
Rene www.AboutNames.ch
One thing is clear however, if you ask me: Your question does not make sense if you don't indicate a language. Even in 106 AD there were a multitude of languages, and pronounciations always depend on language.
So what did you have in mind? Latin? Greek? Hebrew? Something other still?
Rene www.AboutNames.ch