Or, to be more clear
in reply to a message by Miranda
If Jane Doe has a daughter, and gives her both the surname Doe and the fn Jane, then the daughter could be called Jane Doe II.
But if Jane Doe has a daughter, and gives her her own name, but the father's surname, then Jane Smith (the daughter) couldn't be called Jane Smith II, because there isn't a Jane Smith I (married names don't count).
Junior doesn't apply to women in any case other than possibly a nn. The next-door neighbour on the cartoon King of the Hill calls his daughter Connie Con Junior, obviously because he wanted a son.
Hope that's a little more clear!
Miranda
But if Jane Doe has a daughter, and gives her her own name, but the father's surname, then Jane Smith (the daughter) couldn't be called Jane Smith II, because there isn't a Jane Smith I (married names don't count).
Junior doesn't apply to women in any case other than possibly a nn. The next-door neighbour on the cartoon King of the Hill calls his daughter Connie Con Junior, obviously because he wanted a son.
Hope that's a little more clear!
Miranda