View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Meanings and associations are different. (m)
I must respectfully disagree. My Random House unabridged dictionary (first edition, copyright 1966) lists as the second definition of "Cassandra": "one who prophesies doom or disaster". I think that if it makes it into the dictionary one can safely say that Cassandra now has that general meaning and that English speakers can use it in that way without any direct reference to the particular Cassandra who lived in ancient Troy, in the same way that we now "go Dutch" to a restaurant without consciously realizing that was originally a reference to a particular nationality.
vote up1vote down

Replies

It's an allusion...And it is a direct reference to Cassandra if they use her name, although I get where you're coming from. It is a direct reference, but people may not know what it is exactly they are referring to.I also agree with Chrisell and Array. "Cassandra" would not mean "prophet of doom" if Cassandra of Troy was named something like Jennifer, for instance. Then Jennifer, instead of Cassandra, would be listed under "prophet of doom" in the dictionary; however, Cassandra's etymological meaning would remain the same. ~♥Eirena♥~Ruling the world isn't practical.
vote up1vote down
Maybe it's a distinction that only I make, but that's calling a person a cassandra, not a Cassandra. In the same way, the word abigail means "a woman's personal servant." When one uses the name Abigail, it certainly doesn't mean that they're calling their daughter a maid (it might not be so popular then!), because she's not an abigail. In the same way, a girl named Cassandra is only a cassandra if she happens to greet people with "You'll be hit by a bus next Monday."Array
"What are these parents thinking?...Let's name her Madison--she'll live in her own world: 16 square miles surrounded by reality." -- Susan Lampert Smith
vote up1vote down
All I can say is that I've never seen "cassandra" written in lower case even when it is obviously being used with the general meaning. The Random House dictionary still capitalizes it under the second defintion -- just as it capitalizes "Dutch" for both the phrases "go Dutch" and "in Dutch".
vote up1vote down
That would support the argument that the term "a Cassandra" is given in reference to an actual Cassandra, as if it were being used as a general noun it would not be capitalised.
ChrisellAll we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

vote up1vote down
And, of course...You are indeed hit by a bus next Monday. :-pCassandra's prophecies were always true, but nobody believed them because of her curse.
Miranda
"Come... you must eat my child." — From a badficProud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
vote up1vote down
"English speakers can use it in that way without any direct reference to the particular Cassandra who lived in ancient Troy"That doesn't make sense to me, sorry. Without the mythological Cassandra, there wouldn't be a term such as "Cassandra-like", or the use of the name as a reference to prophetic behaviour. The fact that the dictionary has included the reference to Cassandra as a "definition" doesn't change the fact that this "definition" is actually a reference.
ChrisellAll we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

vote up1vote down
The myth is where the meaning comes from, but once it becomes a word in the general language so that people can understand what you mean by it even if they don't know the original myth, then it is more than just a "reference". Without the historical Mr. Boycott, there wouldn't be a word "boycott" in the dictionary, but that doesn't make "boycott" just a reference to his original story; almost no one who uses the word knows who he was any more. But the main point I was trying to make is not about exactly how Cassandra should be presented in the dictionary. It's that it is misleading to use the word "meaning" when referring to a name's etymological origin.
vote up1vote down
Not really... since most names don't have an actual dictionary definition, and those that do are derived from actual words or, like Cassandra, are such common allusions/references that they have come to mean what that person was. Names' "meanings" come from their base language, etc, etc, and what the names signified back when they *did* have a "dictionary definition".Umm... sorry to butt into this argument. :S~♥Eirena♥~Ruling the world isn't practical.
vote up1vote down