New Post
Search
HelpRe: Actually +
in reply to a message by Kris Rose
That may be true for you (liking traditional gender and not word names), and it may be partly true for Tota, but s/he makes it pretty clear that there is a sexist issue going on with the comment about dignity and manhood being robbed by, horror of horrors, Pleasant as a MN. Even if s/he also dislikes boys names on girls, it is still ass backwards to assume that one's dignity and manhood lie in the balance over a MN that as a word would be considered ungendered but the poster perceived as not masculine enough for a locker room discussion (and we all know that locker room discussions define the man).
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
The locker room was an example. In my opinion, the name Pleasant is a word, and not one I would immeidately associate with use on a male. I am also sure it is not a name the general population would find appealing as name for either gender. It is moreso a word than name, and as ridiculous as the words Jolly or Charming being used.
1