New Post
Search
HelpRe: The politics
in reply to a message by Adelle
I can completely understand the desire to not politicize your child's name, but I don't think Lincoln calls up nearly the same level of partisan association as Kennedy, Reagan, or Clinton would. Lincoln is highly admired by many people on both sides of the political spectrum today - Republicans love to note that Lincoln was one of them while Democrats talk about how modern Republicans are vastly different from Lincoln.
I can't help disliking the name itself for reasons completely unrelated to the Presidential connection. For me it's a surname, and despite its historical and current use as a personal name (former RI Senator Lincoln Chafee comes to mind)I can't view it as anything else. Additionally, I don't find the sound attractive and I'm rather annoyed by the non-phonetical spelling. Apparently I'm alone in this, though - Haven's right that the name is becoming more popular. I just looked it up on the Social Security site and Lincoln's steadily moved up in the rankings from 1991 (837) to 2005 (492).
I can't help disliking the name itself for reasons completely unrelated to the Presidential connection. For me it's a surname, and despite its historical and current use as a personal name (former RI Senator Lincoln Chafee comes to mind)I can't view it as anything else. Additionally, I don't find the sound attractive and I'm rather annoyed by the non-phonetical spelling. Apparently I'm alone in this, though - Haven's right that the name is becoming more popular. I just looked it up on the Social Security site and Lincoln's steadily moved up in the rankings from 1991 (837) to 2005 (492).
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
It's not about the politics
It's about a man who is idealized far beyond what he really was and treated almost like a God. Hence why I mentioned both Jefferson and Washington in the statement.
I really dislike that part of it.
It's about a man who is idealized far beyond what he really was and treated almost like a God. Hence why I mentioned both Jefferson and Washington in the statement.
I really dislike that part of it.
1
Right.
People have deified Lincoln b/c of emancipation, and the truth is, if Lincoln could've united the country without freeing the slaves, then he would never have signed the legislation. People make him into a hero for freeing the slaves, when in reality, he was simply trying to unite the country.
People have deified Lincoln b/c of emancipation, and the truth is, if Lincoln could've united the country without freeing the slaves, then he would never have signed the legislation. People make him into a hero for freeing the slaves, when in reality, he was simply trying to unite the country.
1