View Message

To me, Dakota has made the transition from being the name of a nation to a name that could be carried by an individual person. Same with names like Hunter and India; I don't particularly like them, but at least I'm used to the idea now of them being names as well as things and places.

---

To each their own, though. I can understand why someone would find Dakota offensive, but I'm personally not moved one way or the other by it.

This message was edited 1/21/2007, 7:39 AM