View Message

nicknames
Should I use nicknames for any of the following names:Thomas
Samuel
Charlotte
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

i like Charlie for Charlotte, Tom for Thomas, and Sam for Samuel.
vote up1
I don't like nicknames for any of them, except maybe Lotte or Lottie for Charlotte
vote up1
I prefer all of those names without nicknames, especially Samuel and Thomas. The full names are much nicer.
"The only man who makes no mistakes is the man who never does anything." ~~ Theodore Roosevelt
Loving Theodore Elliott and Chava Louise!
vote up1
I like Charlie for Charlotte, but pronounced with the "sh" as in Charlotte.
vote up1
It's completely up to you. Nns are supposed to be signs of affection. They shouldn't be forced or contrived. They should naturally flow, if they exist at all.
vote up1
I don't think you need to use nicknames, but Sammy and Thomas are nice. Charlotte is so pretty I probably wouldn't use a nn very often. but I do like Lotte.Luxiana
vote up1
I prefer Thomas and Charlotte as is, without nn's, but I love Sam as a nn for Samuel. But I don't think any of them 'need' a nn, definitely not. :)
vote up1
I don't think they necessarily NEED them, but they all have popularly used NN so it may be inevitable that other people use them, too.
vote up1
I prefer them with nicknames. You'll have a hard time with Samuel if you don't want him to be nn'ed. Sam's more ubiquitous than any of the others, IMO.For Thomas, I prefer Tom, Tam, Tommy, and Thom (I pronunce the H). For Charlotte, I like Tatty and Lotte best.Array
vote up1
i think the nn would just come any ways, if not from you than from friends latter on. Tom,Tommy Sam Charlie..
vote up1
Post under ONE name ONLY please, Balie / Belle / Lexie / Pearl / BethIt is strictly against the rules to post under more than one name. Please choose ONE name and stick to that name from now on. I would appreciate it if you reply to this message to let me know that you understand.Please read the rules (see the Help/Rules/FAQ link at the top of the board) before making any more posts on this site.
~Chrisell~ Proudly Australian www.archaeochrisell.blogspot.com
vote up1
Attn: Balie / BelleJust to let you know: it's against our rules to post under more than one username. Please pick one and keep it. Our rules are listed with the FAQ; you should read them before you post.
vote up1
You can if you want to, but be aware that no matter what you prefer, as the child grows up he or she may well choose to go by a different name. You can either go along and call him his chosen nn, or you can sort of let that be his "public" nn and call him the name you prefer at home, with the family.I would use a nn for Thomas,, it's almost inevitable that a Thomas will end up as Tom or Tommy.Samuel is likewise almost certain to get shortened to Sam or Sammy (I wouldn't recommend somebody going by Sammy after they're grown up!).As to Charlotte, I don't think a nn is quite as inevitable with it. Hardly anybody goes by Lottie these days, and Charlie is still pretty strongly associated with boys, at least around here. A Charlotte can always grow into Charlie or Lottie or whatever later on.
vote up1
I disagree...I don't think it is inevitable that a Thomas or a Samuel will end up as Tom, Tommy, Sam, or Sammy. I know 2 Thomas' (my brother and my dad) and a Samuel, and they all go by their full names. My brother and my dad have ALWAYS gone by Thomas. There are a few people that call Samuel "Sam" but most people call him Samuel. I think it just depends on what you want to call them. If you want people to call them Samuel or Thomas, then introduce them as Samuel or Thomas.BTW, why do you not recommend somebody going by Sammy after they've grown up?Photobucket - Video and Image HostingLoving the names Alexa Noelle and Owen Seth
Check out MySpace: www.myspace.com/turtlefreek2

This message was edited 10/31/2006, 9:24 AM

vote up1
For the same reason I wouldn't recommend somebody named David going by Davey as an adult, or a Nicholas going by Nicky. Some nn's are just better on children than adults.This is subject to regional tastes, though. In the South, it's quite common to see men called Tommy, Billy, Bobby and Ricky etc, but up north you don't see it as much and it seems not to be the thing to do.I know many Thomases (including an uncle) but I know of none who go by the full name in their daily lives. I do know a couple who have, say, business cards that identify them as Thomas professionally, but even they are not called Thomas socially.I know a couple Sams, but none of them goes by Samuel. (Unless their mothers are mad at them! lolMy husband is named Phillip, and his parents never called him Phil and never wanted anybody else to. But most everybody he meets, even though he would introduce himself as Phillip, takes it upon themselves to shorten it to Phil, and he has jsut about given up trying to correct them. So, with family and a few close friends he's still Phillip, but most of his work buddies and such call him Phil. They kow what his preferred name is, (if I call his work and ask to talk to Phillip, they know who I mean) but it's like they can't stop themselves from trimming it down.
vote up1
If you want to use nicknames, go for it. If not, don't sweat it. :-) It doesn't seem like much of a 'should' issue to me. At some point kids will decide for themselves anyway what they want to be called, so all you can do is start out with your own preference and hope for the best. Personally I like Sam for Samuel, but I prefer Thomas and Charlotte over their possible nicknames.

www.qwantz.com

This message was edited 10/31/2006, 7:36 AM

vote up1
I would personally as I really like the nicknames Tom, Sam and Charlie or Lottie but all the full names are very nice too so it just depends really on whether you like the nicknames enough. I know a Thomas and a Samuel who are always called by their full names so it's not a foregone conclusion that they'll just get nicknames anyway.
vote up1
If you feel like it.
vote up1