New Post
Search
HelpSummyrrh
This is the name of a young local girl who was pictured in some brief story that's going to be run in the paper I work for next week. (The original draft of the story had misspelt the name as Summmyrrh, but then had "ok" written over the two-M version.) I'm assuming it's supposed to be Summer, but it looks absolutely awful! I've seen a few other names in the course of my proofreading duties that have had "ok" marked over them after someone else checked the original copies (like Kaitlin and Haylea), but those names are at least intelligible and won't give their owners a headache when they're learning to spell!
“The caveman method I abhor, and I do not believe that it is ever successful with the women who is worth having. Who could desire a woman taken by force? Who would gain any pleasure from loving or caressing a woman who did not give in return?"
“The caveman method I abhor, and I do not believe that it is ever successful with the women who is worth having. Who could desire a woman taken by force? Who would gain any pleasure from loving or caressing a woman who did not give in return?"
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Oy! That's painful to even look at! Why all the double letters and confusion?!? YUCK!
1
Definitely a wild spelling. I don't see why they had to complicate Summer. Imagine how many times the girl has to correct people.
This message was edited 9/11/2006, 6:56 PM
1
Blech! That's hideous! Summer is a nice name, and unusual enough without screwing with the spelling.
Poor child.
Poor child.
1
Ha ha...you know what I thought of? The wise men. "We've already got the frankincense, but I think we need Summyrrh." Lol...I crack myself up.
1
worked on me, too =)
- mirfak
- mirfak
1
Well, of course, the existence of the word "myrrh" is where the parents got the idea that Summyrrh could be a respelling of Summer. This is an example of where it's wrong to automatically call respellings one doesn't like "illiterate". The problem these parents had is that they were a little too literate in the sense of knowing too many different ways that one can spell the sound "mer" in English. :)
1
I agree . . .
I'd say it's probably a fairly immature way to create a name, but not illiterate.
When I was 13 I was very interested in names (of course) and in linguistics, and I was fascinated with the ways different letters could be arranged to make the same sounds. By using sounds that I knew would work, I created a new name for a character: Cherhys. Basically a combination of Cherie and Rhys, pronounced much like Sharise. I can remember trying to get my mother to guess how it was pronounced! Summyrrh as a bizarre combination name reminds me of my invention of Cherhys.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
I'd say it's probably a fairly immature way to create a name, but not illiterate.
When I was 13 I was very interested in names (of course) and in linguistics, and I was fascinated with the ways different letters could be arranged to make the same sounds. By using sounds that I knew would work, I created a new name for a character: Cherhys. Basically a combination of Cherie and Rhys, pronounced much like Sharise. I can remember trying to get my mother to guess how it was pronounced! Summyrrh as a bizarre combination name reminds me of my invention of Cherhys.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
1
I'm not optimistic about the likelihood that Summyrrh's parents actually know anything about myrrh.
1
I don't see . . .
. . . that there's much one *needs* to know about Myrrh to be considered sufficiently informed to use it in a child's name. I'm sure they know that it's incense, that it was used in Biblical times for annointment, and that it's pronounced MER. I think anyone who's been exposed to the word in context would know that.
When you get down to it, most people know about that much, or even less, about the word names that they give their children.
How many parents of girls named Violet know how many petals a violet has, or what its Latin name is? How many kids named Drake have parents who are experts on ducks? How much, for that matter, do your parents know about the chemical composition of stars?
I don't see any need to get all elitist about their level of knowledge with so little evidence available.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
. . . that there's much one *needs* to know about Myrrh to be considered sufficiently informed to use it in a child's name. I'm sure they know that it's incense, that it was used in Biblical times for annointment, and that it's pronounced MER. I think anyone who's been exposed to the word in context would know that.
When you get down to it, most people know about that much, or even less, about the word names that they give their children.
How many parents of girls named Violet know how many petals a violet has, or what its Latin name is? How many kids named Drake have parents who are experts on ducks? How much, for that matter, do your parents know about the chemical composition of stars?
I don't see any need to get all elitist about their level of knowledge with so little evidence available.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
1
I was not suggesting they should know all the ins and outs of myrrh and what it's used for. I am saying that I bet if you asked them "Oh, like myrrh?" they'd look at you blankly and wonder what you were talking about.
I say this because I've heard or read often about parents with a little girl named say, Matisse, and somebody asks them "Is she named after the painter?" and they don't have the first notion what painter they're being asked about. Same with Monet.
I say this because I've heard or read often about parents with a little girl named say, Matisse, and somebody asks them "Is she named after the painter?" and they don't have the first notion what painter they're being asked about. Same with Monet.
1
Matisse and Monet have been used as names for a while now, so it's not surprising that they've spread to people who've never heard of the painters. They will have heard it on someone else's child, or on TV, or something.
However, Myrrh is definitely *not* a word that's in common use as a name. While it's possible that people would be first exposed to Monet and Matisse as childrens' names, I think it's highly unlikely that anyone's first exposure to Myrrh would be anything other than the Nativity story. They would have that association for life, regardless of whether or not they later heard it as a name.
And since they spelled it correctly, they must have seen it written down, either in a dictionary, or in context (even if that context is as simple as a Christmas carol), both of which will impart the meaning.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
However, Myrrh is definitely *not* a word that's in common use as a name. While it's possible that people would be first exposed to Monet and Matisse as childrens' names, I think it's highly unlikely that anyone's first exposure to Myrrh would be anything other than the Nativity story. They would have that association for life, regardless of whether or not they later heard it as a name.
And since they spelled it correctly, they must have seen it written down, either in a dictionary, or in context (even if that context is as simple as a Christmas carol), both of which will impart the meaning.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
1
I guess I wasn't very clear s to what I meatn...
I was operating on the assumption that Summyrrh is somebody's idea of a creative spelling of Summer, and that myrrh didn't have anyting to do with why they spelled the ending like they did.
I was operating on the assumption that Summyrrh is somebody's idea of a creative spelling of Summer, and that myrrh didn't have anyting to do with why they spelled the ending like they did.
1
This is awful! Sometimes is doesn't pay to be original.
1