View Message

Sibset
WDYTO this sib-set I heard of today?Christopher ?
Andrew ?
Matthew David
Garrison Michael
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I like Matthew :)Cassie Anne (not Cassandra!)
Fiance to Grant Stephen
Mum to Hayley Anne :)
D.O.B: 8th October, 2004
vote up1
Boring.
vote up1
Hmmm...All the names are pretty common. I like more unique names, all though I do love Andrew David. I suppose it's not bad.

This message was edited 7/15/2006, 9:21 AM

vote up1
I like Christopher. All of the others, besides Garrison, are nice, noraml names. They are just not for me. Overall, though, the sibset is quite boring .Kristen~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Shake Your Body Like A Bellydancer.
Here is where you are
There is where you want to be
But you can't get there from here ♥

This message was edited 7/15/2006, 7:47 AM

vote up1
I think it is very boring up until Garrison which is extremely out of place! Perhaps if it was Michael Garrison it would be an extremely average sibset.
vote up1
Hmm . . . three nice normal names and a military establishment.It doesn't quite work for me!Christopher, Andrew and Matthew are nice together, although very typically 1980s.
ChrisellAll we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

vote up1
I think Garrison doesn't fit. That's the only non-biblical name, right?! (or am i wrong?)anyway - it doesn't fit.BUT the sib-set is great. averadge but alright
vote up1