View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Are these names dated?
Michelle: Not imo...it was more popular in the 70s, but it doesn't stand out as dated in my book. I think it's a lovely name, in fact, one that I really like :)Sydney: Not at all dated imo...more on the trendy side, if anything. I like it :)Hannah: Very classic and feminine...not dated in the least.Ailyn: Since I've never seen it before, I can't really say that it's dated, although Eileen does seem to be imo.Jacqueline: Another name that was popular in previous decades, but I think it's one that could be used today. Very pretty :)Natalie: No, still very popular today, so not dated by my standards. I really like it :)Taylor: Not at all dated for a girl...too trendy to be dated imo. For a boy, though, it was more popular before, so a little bit.Mary: Perhaps a little, although it's still a lovely name. I think, though, that it's classic, and very much usable...likewise with Maria.Chandler: Not dated for a girl...although it's all boy imo.Leigha: With this spelling, no...and even Leah isn't dated imo. Very classicSophia: On the popular side right now and not dated. Could definitely see it on a little girl today.
Jennifer Nicole
Loving the Names:
Ariella Kathryn, Carrie Marie, Elisabeth Ava, Faith Alexandra, Michaela Reese
Cade Preston, Deacon James, Grant William, Jude Hamilton, Roman Spencer
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

No replies