View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Choose one :)
Oakley has an unattractive sound, "oak". Oak by itself would be a nature name and sound less trendy.
I like Madison.
Haley is fine.
I dislike Hadley; D and L clash here.
Everly and variants don't sound that pretty to me, but it is better than Beverly. Not Kimberly, though. I like Ever more, but Ember and Amber are preferred.
Madilyn is an okay variant.
Katelyn is not too bad but I prefer Kaitlyn or Kaitlin if it must be a variant.
Renesmee looks strange and Renee and Esme do not mix as well as they were intended, too. Even Renee-Esme and Esme-Renee sound clunky. They're both really nice names, though.
I love Rain. Its a nature name!
Snow - same reason that I love Rain.
Angel - it sounds peaceful. I knew a good kid with this name. I hope they are doing well now.
Greyson and Grayson sound cool.
Sawyer - to be honest, I don't like the sounds in this one. "Aw" sounds are not that attractive to me (Aubrey, Audrey, Audley, Lawyer, Laura, Laurie). There are some exceptions, but not many at the top of my head.
Nox looks better than Knox - the K looks strange. I do like the way it sounds, though.
I love Sky.
I think Riven is cool but prefer River and Raven.https://youtube.com/@MarioDrama632 or
https://youtube.com/@Objects_2763 :3

Replies

Aren't nature names just as trendy? I mean, we've got Juniper, Wren, River, and Rain rising up the charts, not to mention how many flower/plant names are already in the top 200.