View Message

Yeah, it just doesn't work as a name.

I think it's a bit too much, although not unusable. Perhaps it would better remain in the middle name or last name category. Actually, I find Hawk or Hawke quite charming as a last name.

---

ETA: I second Manipura's idea of Hazel, Cliff, and Hawk as a sibset.

This message was edited 10/16/2022, 3:59 AM

Yeah, kind of.
Because of hock as in pawn, or a hock of ham.
And hawking a loogie.

---

I could see it, though.
It's not as bad as Puck, Chuck, Doc, Rock, Huckleberry imo.
I'm not sure if it's better or worse than Buck, Brock, Hank, Heath, Hawthorn.

---

I used to know brothers named Bucky and Heath, and I feel like it'd fit in. Bucky, Heath, & Hawk. Or something like Hazel, Cliff, & Hawk

This message was edited 10/16/2022, 3:05 AM

I really like Hawk. It has a pleasant sound, and I have a soft spot for animal names.

Hawk = bird of prey, yes I suppose it's OK for bird-lovers. Hawk, as in hawking and spitting, is unthinkable.

Hawk is a guilty pleasure of mine.

---

As well as...

---

Hawke
Hawken
Hawkin
Hawkins
Hawking
Hawkley

Sounds like hock, like you're choking something up.

Don't like it at all