View Message

Twins
I met 15 month old twins today David and Sarah. Also I met two brothers David and Duncan who were around 3 and 5 years old.
I was a little surprised as where I live you don’t hear David very often now. WDYT of the sibsets?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

David and Sarah both solid classics, attractive and timeless. Dont know what kind of person could say anything bad about them. Know 2 Davids, no Sarahs or Duncans but would rather see any of them more than yet another Riley or anything begining with Mc - those really are boring.
vote up1
That’s weird. My cousin’s girlfriend has a kid who’s like five or six named David. It got me thinking how I don’t know any kids named David, and I work with kids.
vote up1
David and Sarah is super dull. Duncan is mildly more interesting.
vote up1
I like Sarah, David is okay, but I agree with the other comments. They are both really boring.
vote up1
They're both incredibly forgettable.
vote up1
David & Sarah is... surprisingly boring, if I'm being brutally honest, given the variety of names in general use today. In fact they are both among the most common names among people I have known throughout my life. (The amount of Davids / Daves I've known has been unreal.)Funnily enough I like both names individually (though I prefer the Sara spelling); yet together, as twins, makes me think the parents couldn't agree on anything else and these are compromise names.Duncan is the only name of the three I don't like - can never get "dunkin'" (as in Dunkin' Donuts) out of my head.
vote up2
David is very rare here too; I'm delighted to see it inching its way back. Duncan is also pleasingly vintage, but I just can't warm up to Sarah.
vote up1