New Post
Search
HelpRe: Why don't you guys like the name Bexley?
in reply to a message by GP
For the same reason I don't like Fexley or Brixley. Why would I.
If it's in the Top 1000, it does have trendiness going for it, but that's not in itself a reason for me to like it, just would mean it's slightly more likely to blend into a crowd than Fexley or Brixley. I guess it could be likable as a way to smoosh Rebecca and Ashley together into an honoring name, but that's nms.
I will say I don't think it's hideous, and I'd rather be Bexley than Bentley, Kinsley, Braxton, Ainsley, Presley, Sloan, but also I'd probably prefer most names over Bexley, even just picking from trendy surnamey ones, like for instance I'd rather be Saylor, Oakley, Bennett, Bellamy, Marley, Delaney, Bronte, Brooks, Hendrix...
I'd rate it about the same as I would Blakely and Ryleigh probably. Or maybe Hadley and Parker. There's nothing appealing about those to me, but (given current trends) I don't think they're unfortunate names to have, objectively, nor do I absolutely hate them aesthetically. 4/10
If it's in the Top 1000, it does have trendiness going for it, but that's not in itself a reason for me to like it, just would mean it's slightly more likely to blend into a crowd than Fexley or Brixley. I guess it could be likable as a way to smoosh Rebecca and Ashley together into an honoring name, but that's nms.
I will say I don't think it's hideous, and I'd rather be Bexley than Bentley, Kinsley, Braxton, Ainsley, Presley, Sloan, but also I'd probably prefer most names over Bexley, even just picking from trendy surnamey ones, like for instance I'd rather be Saylor, Oakley, Bennett, Bellamy, Marley, Delaney, Bronte, Brooks, Hendrix...
I'd rate it about the same as I would Blakely and Ryleigh probably. Or maybe Hadley and Parker. There's nothing appealing about those to me, but (given current trends) I don't think they're unfortunate names to have, objectively, nor do I absolutely hate them aesthetically. 4/10
This message was edited 6/1/2022, 4:39 PM
Archived Thread - replies disabled
2