View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Be a doll, and rate these names. (m)
Velma: 4/10
It’s got charm but it’s still kind of retro-ugly, and still closely associated with Scooby Doo. It is kind of cool, though. I think I prefer Selma.Kirsten: 3/10
I don’t think it has a good sound, and I find Kristen so much prettier!Iris: 10/10
Lovely. It’s soft but carries a subtle air of strength and class.Lorena: 8/10
I’m actually a long time admirer of this name, I think it’s strong and mature, but not in a matronly way. Loretta is nice too.Winona: 7/10
Cool name! It makes me think of Winona Ryder. I don’t like Winnie, though.Rory: 2/10
I really dislike it on a girl, it’s a lot more bearable on a boy, but even then it feels awkward and infantile.Bess: 1/10
I find it awful.Bryce: 1/10
I think Bryce is kind of dated now a days? I don’t know, I never liked it, it’s odd.Wolf: 2/10
Weird, I’ve never warmed up to male animal trend-names like Wolf, Bear & Fox.Keaton: 2/10
Kind of country bumpkin, and it conjures the image of someone kind of dumb and douche-y.Marlowe: 2/10
Really dislike it on a boy, but really like it on a girl.Benedict: 4/10
Benjamin is better, if you have to Ben- at all. It’s just bland and lacks personality.Roswell: 2/10
Seems like a surname? And not one that transfers well to first name usage, at that.Axel: 4/10
I had a neighbor named Axel that I liked, but it just screams trying to hard for whatever reason for me.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

No replies