New Post
Search
HelpRe: Lucifer...but on a girl.
in reply to a message by MasterCiaraXo
I don't particularly have that much against Lucifer on a girl any more than I do on a boy, I just think it's a bold choice. But man. This person's full name is a lot. I guess some people may treat their children as their OC's and really do name them in the same fashion but it's just very extra and I can't imagine it being easy having a name that will make some people think of 2000's fanfiction tropes. Just one hell of a name, definitely leaves an impression.
If it was something like Lucifer Jane Smith, I'd be much more willing to believe the parents just genuinely liked the name rather than choosing it for the shock value. But if your aim is to have as many people as possible doing double takes at your kid's name then I don't think there's a better choice than cramming in Lucifer, Venus, Morningstar and an unusual spelling of Abigail in there. Certainly very striking. As a wearer of an unusual first name (and only first name), I'm guessing I wouldn't personally enjoy that much but I guess it suits some people.
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/109883
If it was something like Lucifer Jane Smith, I'd be much more willing to believe the parents just genuinely liked the name rather than choosing it for the shock value. But if your aim is to have as many people as possible doing double takes at your kid's name then I don't think there's a better choice than cramming in Lucifer, Venus, Morningstar and an unusual spelling of Abigail in there. Certainly very striking. As a wearer of an unusual first name (and only first name), I'm guessing I wouldn't personally enjoy that much but I guess it suits some people.
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/109883
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1