View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Marjorie, Constance, James (m)
in reply to a message by Raya
That's hilarious! When I saw 'James (m)' I never thought there was a message ...James for a boy would rank highest, and for a girl stone last.I'd put Marjorie first: it counts as classic and is due for a come-back. And it's a family name. I also like Constance, and Con is fine but I'm not keen on Connie.I think they'd work well as a sibset: all of them pretty timeless. Of course, there is the trendiness of James (f) to consider. But the sound of the three together is fine.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

No replies