View Message

Edna
I think Edna is just about the most unattractive name I can think of. However, at one point, it held some appeal for a lot of people. Can you understand its appeal? What might people have liked about it?Or are you like me in thinking it's irredeemably hideous?
______________________________________________________________________

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I'm with you that it's hideous! I know my great aunt (born in the 1920s) is Kathleen Edna and I think there were other Edna's of her generation in our family.When I was a child Evil Edna was the name of an angry television set in a cartoon (Willo the Wisp) so I also think of that which is a bit of an off-putting image! https://www.google.co.uk/search?source=univ&tbm=isch&q=evil+edna&safe=strict&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiSuKfq4pLrAhVUTsAKHcBuCSgQsAR6BAgIEAE&biw=1366&bih=625As for it's appeal at the time, I'm not sure. It's short and catchy. I think there were other names with a harsh sound which were popular at the time like Hilda, Freda, Brenda etc. Mind you, they are all equally hideous! Must have just been a popular sound like today we have Eva, Ava, Evie etc.
vote up1
Edna was the name of a ggm and it still doesn't get a pass from me. I find it very unattractive. I agree with you very much. IMO, Edna has absolutely nothing going for it.
vote up1
It’s irredeemably hideous. Unquestionably, horribly, ugly. It sounds like a dog throwing up.
I don’t know what the appeal is, because I sure can’t find anything pretty about it.
vote up1
I think is ugly. The Ed-sound seems too masculine.
vote up1
I don’t get its appeal at all, besides the fact that it’s old fashioned and uncommon.
vote up1
My great-grandmother was named Edna. She was born in Philadelphia, in...1905, I think? 1906? I can't remember.Anyway, I agree, the name is hideous. I can't tell you why it was popular...maybe because of fathers named Edward? IDK, it's so clunky and flat and BAH. I really don't like it.
vote up1
I don’t really like it or hate it. It’s not the prettiest name, sure, but it’s not Agatha or Gertrude. Now that I think about it, Agnes and Agatha are two hideous names that everyone on here loves as well.
vote up1
I love itIt's a sturdy, salt-of-the-earth name. Plus, Eddie is an adorable nickname. It's definitely not irredeemably hideous -- I find it infinitely lovelier than Sloane, Kayley, Riley, etc.
vote up1
I also prefer it over Kayley and Riley... but I love Sloane lol. Sloane is totally ugly but... lol it's appealing in a slinky, gray, snake-like way.Both Edna and Sloane have a puggish quality... but Edna is young and poppy, whereas Sloane is tired and baggy... yet I just love Sloane for some reason.
vote up1
My guess is that it appealed because it was new, or seemed new, at the time. I mean, it didn't have a history like Mary and Anna and Elizabeth ad nauseam, so the novelty factor prevailed for a while, and then wore off, as it will.
I think it's hideously ugly. It sounds congested and stuffed up.
vote up1
I can only picture a grumpy old lady with this name. Definitely can’t see it making a comeback in the way that names like Edith have.
vote up1
It's got a lot of appeal for me because it reminds me of some of my favorites like Etta, Edda, Erna, and the nickname Eddie on a girl.But I probably wouldn't use it because it's regarded so negatively, and there's other fresher options to choose from.
vote up1
Double post

This message was edited 8/10/2020, 3:39 AM

vote up1
I don’t love the name, but can see the appeal. My mum knew a wonderful woman called Edna who died when I was about 3 or 4 so I only remember her a bit, but I always think of her when I hear the name.
vote up1
I get why people think it’s ugly but I secretly love it. It has the same clunkiness as Enid but is less bookish. The harshness of it appeals to me too, I think?
But I can’t get past the Dame Edna association.
vote up1
I don't understand all the hate for Edna. I mean, it's not a name I'd use personally and it's not the prettiest name out there, but I don't mind it. Maybe it's different for people whose first language isn't English, like me? I don't know.
vote up1
Me too, and I even used it as sort of a feminine form of Edward (even though I'm 99% wrong). Edna was one of my classmate's name, I just didn't like (or jealous of) her because she was the very social and popular type, while I'm those who sit back and do my own things. We're just too different. But I still think I like the name more than that particular person.
vote up1
"Irredeemably hideous" comes close ... on my dad's side of the family there were two sisters, Eileen and Edna, which is pretty dire all round; their mother's full and only name was Florrie, so perhaps her lack of judgement is understandable. Edna and Ethel would have been even worse.And, going back to an earlier thread, I would enjoy Edith much more if only I hadn't been at school with one (the family went in for the unusual, her full names are Edith Linda Marie!) who was a whiney whinger back in the day and has repeatedly ended up in rehab: drugs and alcohol. And I just see her face, with its expression of sulky desperation.
vote up1
I totally agree with you, yuk
vote up1
Well... when was that at peak popularity? 1890s?That's also when this silhouette was considered appealing:
And when it was like... sexy to have TB.And everyone had snuffboxes on hand at all times full of who the heck knows what.So... I think ppl were just off their rockers tbh.But really tho... Edna is at least young and sprightly sounding, it's sharp (like an elbow to the ribs), and has more energy than other contemporaries like Bertha or Ethel.
vote up1
Lol
vote up1
Lolol. This was a great response.
vote up1