View Message

Yes, it's dated, but it's holding up really well. It was extremely popular in the 70s (#2) and very popular in the 80s, but it still doesn't feel as dated as many other names from that time period, such as Stephanie, Nicole, Christina or Amanda. I think it fits in better with what is popular now. It is similar to names such as Lily, Ruby, Ivy etc. Still I don't think it will make a comeback. It's too early. But it's very usable and doesn't stand out in a negative way.

---

I wouldn't use it because I'm a bit tired of hearing it all the time on people a bit older than myself.