New Post
Search
HelpRe: Facebook BA
in reply to a message by Fictionfan8618
Jesse James = silly for a real kid. Even without the association it's too singsongy and matchy.
Jaxson is weird. I understand Jaxon because it's like Jackson but Saxon, kinda. But with the x and the s there's a redundant sound. Jackson makes more sense anyway (and Jackson Terrence would be a pretty good name).
I don't like the two J's in the same sibset either. If I could change it I'd call one James and the other Terrence.
Jesse and Natalie together sound very 90's (so does the whole sibset actually).
Jaxson is weird. I understand Jaxon because it's like Jackson but Saxon, kinda. But with the x and the s there's a redundant sound. Jackson makes more sense anyway (and Jackson Terrence would be a pretty good name).
I don't like the two J's in the same sibset either. If I could change it I'd call one James and the other Terrence.
Jesse and Natalie together sound very 90's (so does the whole sibset actually).
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
I have to be honest, I agree. The alliteration is rather disappointing, especially when it seems that most twins nowadays have names that are either TOO similar or begin with the same letter. I personally don't care for alliteration sets, especially on twins or other multiples.
1