Message: "further explanation" - Behind the Name

further explanation

by iris (guest)

4/27/2006, 12:20 PM

in reply to a message by iris

Rereading my post I just wanted to clarify something I think was poorly written. I think the Amy Dener connection is loose because you're not naming your hypothetical daughter Amy Denver. It just happens that your name is Amy and her mn is Denver. I don't think the connection is any more noticeable than a John Smith having a daughter named Rachel Denver Smith.

Messages

WDYTO Denver? · Array · 4/27/2006, 9:43 AM

•I only love Denver on a boy n/t · Sabrina Fair · 4/27/2006, 3:27 PM

•Would it be all right on someone else's daughter? (m) · Array · 4/27/2006, 6:50 PM

•Re: Would it be all right on someone else's daughter? (m) · Sabrina Fair · 4/27/2006, 7:04 PM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · Fink · 4/27/2006, 3:24 PM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · Ora · 4/27/2006, 2:51 PM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · Isla · 4/27/2006, 12:29 PM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · Link · 4/27/2006, 10:42 AM

•I need to learn to explain myself more thoroughly. >< (m) · Array · 4/27/2006, 10:35 AM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · iris · 4/27/2006, 10:20 AM

•further explanation · iris · 4/27/2006, 12:20 PM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · LIMEGREEN · 4/27/2006, 9:59 AM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · Narinoc (nsi) · 4/27/2006, 10:12 AM

•I meant to answer the main post nt · Narinoc (nsi) · 4/27/2006, 10:13 AM

•Re: WDYTO Denver? · Elemmennope · 4/27/2006, 9:59 AM

•Agreed. · gypsy · 4/29/2006, 9:31 AM