View Message

Brennan
I adore this name for a girl yes I know it is a boys name but I love it with nicknames like Brenna and Bryn . I need help with a middle name a girlie one please help. What do you think about Brennan Kate or Brennan Lea also should I keep the spelling or change it up thanks
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

If you love Brenna and Bryn, why not use one of them? They are both names in their own right. Brennan is traditionally and still pretty consistently used for boys, so it seems odd to use it instead of the girl names that you actually love. Brenna Kate is cute.Brenna Alethea
Brenna Aisling
Brenna Arwen
Brenna Aurora
Brenna Claire
Brenna Eleanor Bryn Elizabeth
Bryn Isabel
Bryn Scarlett
Bryn Charlotte
Bryn Violet
vote up1
I don't really like Brennan for a boy, and I like it even less for a girl. And a nickname where all you do is drop off the final consenant just feels really unnecessary. Just name the kid Brenna if that's what you'd like to call her!
vote up1
Brennan is all boy to me, and i detest boys names on girls. Just use Brenna for a girl if you like that or use brennan for a boy.Brenna rose
Brenna Caitlin
Brenna Danielle
Brenna Penelope
Brenna Rhiannon
Brenna Ruth
Brenna Juliet
Brenna Roselle
Brenna Ruby
vote up1
Well good thing it's not a boy name, it's actually a unisex name.
Just like Ashley, Kimberley, Brett, Beverly, Kelly, Stacey, Kelsey, Whitney, Lindsay and Brook.....:/

This message was edited 3/20/2019, 4:21 PM

vote up1
Those names started out as boys name but were usurped by parents for girls. And now hardly anyone uses them for boys, because they've become "girly."

This message was edited 3/21/2019, 9:03 AM

vote up1
There's no need to be willfully obtuse, we all know that unisex names exist - that is, names that are used (or, in the case of many you listed, have been used in the past) for both genders in significant numbers. That doesn't mean that you have to *like* such names for both genders. Whatever names other people choose to give their children, one may see a name as sounding more like one gender or the other, and may dislike that name on the gender ones feels it is less suited for. It doesn't have to be that complicated; people have preferences. And I don't agree that Brennan is unisex. Even if some might think it would sound good on a girl, or even choose to name a girl Brennan, it is used and always has been used overwhelmingly more for boys. Liking a name that is traditionally a boy's name for a girl doesn't make it suddenly not traditionally a boy's name.
vote up1
As well as Devon, Logan, Sasha, Quinn, and Bailey if you wanna add to that list, kjk :)

This message was edited 3/20/2019, 6:19 PM

vote up1
Logan is still overwhelmingly used for boys. It has been used for girls in the last few years, but it seems more like a fad than stable usage.
vote up1
Idk I’ve mostly known girl Logans born in the early 90s.
vote up1
I absolutely agree! Plus...Brenna is a very lovely name. Simply adore it (:
vote up1
Why do you detest boy names on girls? I noticed quite a few people have strong opinions on the subject.

This message was edited 3/20/2019, 7:51 AM

vote up1
Usually because it's a 1 way street. It's much rarer for girls names to be used on boys so it doesn't seem fair. Once a name starts being used more on girls, it won't be used on boys as much anymore, because it will be seen as too feminine.
vote up1
Idk, I feel like that's a societal problem that happens with so many things besides names––e.g., career fields that become feminized once women begin to participate in them (nursing, teaching) versus career fields that become masculinized when more men start participating in them (authorship, film, cinematography). In a similar way, I can see how a name can gain feminine and masculine connotations over time, and why they change over time.However, I don't think names get nearly as drastically feminized so quickly or that they always go in the feminizing direction. Tatum is traditionally a feminine name, but it sounds fairly masculine and is quickly gaining in ranking for boys. And most of the cases we see of "boy" names becoming "girl" names are from the 1800s and early 1900s, but it still took decades for that change to take place. Either way, if society sees a name becoming too feminine or effeminate to use for a boy, even if it was only a few years ago then that's an issue with pervasive toxic masculinity and social insecurity. Like, well-established feminine names like Ashley could be considered a stretch for a boy, especially to protect kids from bullying, but even if more girls are being named Forest or Cameron that doesn't necessarily mean that 1) these names will become feminine like the small number that become primarily feminine rather than truly genderless or that 2) we should be supporting a culture of toxic masculinity / masculine insecurity in the first place. Rather, I think we should be welcoming a more nuanced and fluid understanding of how concepts and names and expressions become gendered over time.

This message was edited 3/21/2019, 9:04 PM

vote up1
I dislike Brennan on either. On a boy, it sounds like a sloppy version of Brendan, and on a girl it's just part of the current gender-bender trend.If you like Brenna, and actually prefer it to Brenda, why not just use it and not mess about with Brennan and its unconvincing nns?
vote up1
Ooh that’s a nice name!! It’s a pretty uncommon name, so I don’t think it’s particularly gendered that you’d need to worry about it. I think it’s pretty easily gender neutral. Some other combinations...Brennan Mae / May
Brennan Margot
Brennan Rose (I like this because it kind of sounds like Briar Rose??)

This message was edited 3/19/2019, 10:18 PM

vote up1