Re: Seana (f)
in reply to a message by Paul
I'm surprised it's still in the submitted names and not the main database.
It's more pseudo-Irish than pseudo-Latin IMO ... the Latin-like feminine "a" ending, tacked onto an Irish name without changing the Irish. It's more like Alberta than it is like Ludovicus.
But BtN doesn't stand behind what name submitters say. It just says Seanna is a feminine form of Sean.
It's one of the few names I prefer with two Ns - Seanna. I like it that way. I also like Deanna more than Deana. For some reason Seanna looks more like it's Shawna, and Seana looks like See-na to me, the way Deana looks like Dee-na.
- mirfak
It's more pseudo-Irish than pseudo-Latin IMO ... the Latin-like feminine "a" ending, tacked onto an Irish name without changing the Irish. It's more like Alberta than it is like Ludovicus.
But BtN doesn't stand behind what name submitters say. It just says Seanna is a feminine form of Sean.
It's one of the few names I prefer with two Ns - Seanna. I like it that way. I also like Deanna more than Deana. For some reason Seanna looks more like it's Shawna, and Seana looks like See-na to me, the way Deana looks like Dee-na.
- mirfak