View Message

Tristan is nice. Kind of has that curse of being a fad - like Brian, Denis, Liam - but not as bad of a fad. I like it, it's got the crisp/soft sound of Christian but is pagan.
Ashton is just a fad to me, it's like Preston or Spencer, preppyish but mediocre, and I don't like the sht sound in it. I like nn Ash though.
Harrison seems fine as a first name, but I can't say I like it, really. The sound of it is pleasant but it also has that chilly, overdressed or aggressive vibe that surnamey surnames always have in some degree. And, it would tend to be Harry.

This message was edited 7/27/2018, 10:08 PM

I quite like Tristan, though not enough to use.

---

The other two are just surnames to me.

I live Tristan. It has meaning and history, and it’s gorgeous.

---

The other two are too trendy and other-people’s-random-surnamey. I am so sick of the surname trend.

Dislike them all. The latter two are just fashionable surnames and Tristan has a terrible meaning (“sad,” etc.). Would really avoid them all.

Hi peonini !!!

---

Tristan 9/10 I love this name, how It looks like, its strong, long, romantic, Medieval history. It is awesome and shining.

---

Ashton 2/10 It seems a surname and I have no ties with It. Ashford has a better sound.

---

Harrison 3/10 It is ok but nms. I would use it only if father, granny or a dear relative is named Harry. Harry has 9/10 instead.