All seems about right (m)
in reply to a message by Just Jonquil
Amanda is incredibly posh, and happens to belong to the biggest toff I’ve met. Tracy is a name used on about every demographic but no one really uses it now, so I would disagree with it lasting generations. As with that and the more classic sounding ones (e.g Catherine, Harriet, Imogen, Charles, Henry, Thomas, William, etc.), they’re used by everyone, but of course of course Tatler think they belong to the upper classes.
Jagoda
★ Top 25: https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/136993/97278 ★
Jagoda
★ Top 25: https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/136993/97278 ★
This message was edited 12/31/2017, 3:52 AM
Replies
I also know a posh Mandy ;)
Same here. I grew up with a ton of Amandas, Kristens, Jennifers, Ashleys, Taylors .... I don’t consider these names upper class or lower class, just “80s/90s trendy.”
I'd personally say that Amanda was fairly ubiquitous in the UK as well (though not nearly as popular as it was in North America). I was at school with several Amandas in the 80s and 90s. Some very middle class, others from a council estate and some in between. I can see it being used by posh people though. I suspect it started out as being upper class and then spread when it became popular.